Da Da Da
I was enjoying our 40th Anniversary party the other night when a listener approached me to ask if we’d “received any feedback on the Dada and Surrealism Festival, and was any of it negative?” I replied, “No…Nothing much. What, are you going to be the first guy to complain?” He laughed because, as you can guess, we heard from listeners in droves.
Personally, I enjoyed the salutary effects of a break from the “news cycle.” For a few blissful days, we knew nothing of what McCain said about Obama or vice versa—no coverage of “terrorist fist jabs,” who was pregnant and when they were getting married or the finer points of Paris Hilton’s energy plan. We turned instead to the audacity of Dada.
This jump beyond the rational and the quotidian, offered a sense of respite and freedom for some, as illustrated in this text message from listener Brooke Cardin to host Daniel Flessas: “I love DADA. When we reach true DADA, the unreality becomes indistinguishable from the previously accepted norms. A delicious calm underlies our confusion. The war is absurd, and we can at last separate it from ourselves. Viva DADA.”
I hear and understand that the five-day festival was not popular with everyone. I know that it won’t push us past OPB in the drive-time ratings. For the people who say that the station went way overboard, I respect that position. Yet I am also happy that KBOO can still be outrageous, creative, fun and on occasion fly in the face of all common sense. It’s nice not to be serious every once in awhile.
- Urselynne's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Comments
Are any recordings of the
Are any recordings of the festival available at rapidshare ?
wow. it really is true that
wow. it really is true that the short-sighted, the narrow-minded, the complainers are (unfortunately) the ones you're more likely to hear from, as is evident here (and on talk radio any day, blah blah). Too bad, but not surprising, given our collective diminishing imagination. Anger compels one to mouth off more than being thrilled and even pleasantly shocked by something as insanely radio-bending as DADA and surrealism. Where's my familiar folkbluegrassreggaegratefulObamaetcetc? i guess that hasn't changed, eh? The original reactions to the DADAists-even from the so-called intellectuals and the art community of the day--were just as snooty and sometimes violent. Good thing we have lattes now.
Most radio stations would be very afraid to take a risk like KBOO does, and they are to be supported even moreso for thinking and programming outside the box, imo. When an organization takes a chance, it should be championed. When Powell's Books was still thinking that letting their employees unionize would make them seem like a "bad" employer, and that it might affect business negatively, plenty of free-thinking folks let them know that this was a reason to support it, from the customer's viewpoint. This is no different. All champions of radical experimental, nonsensical, and bizarre radio, KBOO needs to hear from you, lest they only hear from the nay-sayers (read below) and chicken out in the future.
dada can make you angry, but it could make you euphoric
In my now 60 years on the planet it has become quite clear to me that the average citizen of the United States can get really angry whenever art becomes even remotely political and, even more, confronts (rather than comforts) their basic assumptions about not only our art and culture but the very basics of what we call existence and consciousness.
Our festival was not only an artistic event, it was also an experiment in altering consciousness and a profound political statement which confronted every aspect of our culture and of our communal thought as it lurched unstructured from anti-war poems to wide-ranging, vicious satire to screaming rage and nonsense; and as it assaulted every conceivable "rule" in the books defining "normal" and "right" and "proper."
This approach to art (anti-art) brought on incredible anger and violence when it first appeared waving its many manifestos (side-by-side, arms often linked with the WWI anti-war movement, anarchists and communists) and as we answered the phones during the festival we found that it hadn't lost its potency even after almost 100 years.
Anyone seriously and consciously engaged in contemporary art of any form can easily recognize how much almost everything we confront in contemporary culture and art has at least one foot in Dada/Surrealism, consciously or not. Those who cannot recognize the connections are those who are entering the twenty-first century still sound asleep wrapped in their many comforting but self-limiting delusions. They almost always get very angry when someone's activity threatens to wake them.
Because I did anticipate some negative reaction (we had some angry people when we did this in 2001 as well, although interestingly not as intense as this time ... have we become more fearful and conservative during the years of Bushco?) I made sure that this year we would begin the festival (in emails, on-line and on the air) with the following manifesto penned by Surrealist Suzanne Cesaire in 1941 which says it all quite well:
"No longer is it a matter of the narrow roads where traditional beauty is offered in its clarity and obviousness to the admiration of the crowds. The crowds were taught the victory of intelligence over the world and the submission of the forces of nature to man.
Now it is a question of seizing and admiring a new art which leaves humankind in its true condition, fragile and dependent, and which nevertheless, in the very spectacle of things ignored or silenced, opens unsuspected possibilities to the artist.
And this is the domain of the strange, the Marvelous, and the fantastic, a domain scorned by people of certain inclinations. Here is the freed image, dazzling and beautiful, with a beauty that could not be more unexpected and overwhelming. Here are the poet, the painter, and the artist, presiding over the metamorphoses and the inversions of the world under the sign of hallucination and madness ... Here at last the world of nature and things makes direct contact with the human being who is again in the fullest sense spontaneous and natural. Here at last is the true communion and the true knowledge, chance mastered and recognized, the mystery now a friend and helpful."
If you aren't ready for that, my fellow KBOO volunteer/listeners, I'm honestly sorry for your life so easily threatened, so unready to be too deeply self-examined and explored. But please give the rest of us a chance to be open and to explore with uninhibited joy and wonder every now and then. Those of us who do "get it" found ourselves euphoric through those few days, especially because it was prolonged, sustained and continuous. I've heard someone refer to it recently as the "festival buzz." And after all, we do try to be very tolerant of you and all of your "acceptable" festivals, specials and celebrations. Often we even join in. So tragic that you were unable to join us in ours.
da da festival comments
Dear Mr. Francis,
I read your comments with sadness.
In my earlier post to Mr. Davis, I tried to express that the Da Da Festival was a programming mistake, NOT that I personally did not like the content, or that Da Da is somehow inherently bad. My issue was the sheer obliteration of the KBOO schedule for 101 hours. I did also notice the other posts that took a very negative attitude towards the content of your festival.
I am quite well educated, and have taken art history. I understand Da Da, and surrealism. I even enjoy it when I am in the mood for it, and am a paying patron of small local theatre, where I deliberately go to the plays that are the strangest, and most challenging. I listen to a wide variety of music, and am also no stranger to altered conciousness or the potential political implications of art.
So I need you to know it is highly disappointing to read your comments that you're "sorry for your life so easily threatened, so unready to be too deeply self-examined and explored." Excuse me? Since when do you know my life, and where do you get to become the abiter of how threatened or un-explored it is? Comments like this are simply the polar opposite of the earlier post, "Da Da Dumb"...both posts are dismissive and disrespectful.
So, let me be clear. If you read my earlier post, I disagree with the programming decision for 101 continuous hours. I would disagree with 101 continuous hours of Bach. I would tune away from 101 hours of news coverage. I enjoy silent meditation, should I advocate for 101 hours of dead air?
"And after all, we do try to be very tolerant of you and all of your "acceptable" festivals, specials and celebrations. Often we even join in. So tragic that you were unable to join us in ours."
I'm sorry, but this comment is highly disrespectful. In fact, I personally did listen several different times to Da Da, and made my own personal decision not to listen any more. The only other long programmed festival that I am aware of on KBOO is the Blues Festival, which is usually four sometimes five days, but only about 11 to 12 hours per day. I don't know if KBOO recieves complaints about this or not, but I highly doubt Da Da has the same audience as Blues. After all, if the Da Da festival was live at the waterfront, I doubt it would draw a crowd.
However, KBOO is a place where alternative programming and experiments should be encouraged, I fully agree and affirm this. So, there should be time for Da Da on KBOO, but as a programming decision, not 101 continuous hours. I will take at face value, without judgement your comments that the prolonged, sustained and continuous nature of the festival helped you attain the personal euphoria you desire, and other fans of the festival may agree. However, not all KBOO listeners need this process to achieve their own personal euphoria, and even though I would never criticise your methods, the needs of the entire KBOO community need to be balanced against the needs of Da Da enthusiasts.
If KBOO ever develops multiple internet streams, then Da Da could go on for a week (or longer) without hijacking the air signal and the main stream. This would make more sense to me as a programming decision.
Ed
whooping it up in bed!
I was worried - how would I ever be able to listen to so much KBOO during the Da Da days? I live in Toronto and so I have to stream. You can't stream while on your bike or working in a basement storage. But as luck would have it I broke my foot a week before and was stuck in bed and sitting around the house for two weeks! My prayers were answered! I had an amazing time listening and was thoroughly entertained :)
Clear Channel Conspiracy?
Was this an idea someone from Clear Channel thought up to drive KBOO off the air?
Da Da Dumb
Thanks, to the Da Da Dumb festival, ya'll cured my addiction to KBOO. It got me out of my routine and I don't listen to KBOO as much now. Five days of this annoying noise was way too much. One hour of it might be O.K. One day of it I could ignore, but five whole days. I bet ya'll lost a lot of loyal listeners. I know my radio listening habits shifted away from KBOO, because of it. Please, don't do this to our community, again. Of all the things you could give five days to. If you want to keep your listeners, don't do this to us.
Reformed KBOO addict
DopeDopeDope
The idea that the DaDa show was "outrageous, creative, fun and ... nice not to be serious every once in awhile" simply flies in the face of reality. KBOO is losing membership and listeners for many reasons, but Dada would have to be a significant reason why KBOO loses versus some other station like OPB. I would have to admit it was outrageous - however it was not fun, but boring and stupid from my vantage. Maybe you have some secret section of the world that wants Dada so badly that they will tune (and pay for) KBOO.
I wrote earlier to the program director and never received an answer. I suspect that I was not the only person ignored by any response in this affair. I expect KBOO to do a lot better in both the areas of programming and communication.
Da Da Da
Wow. What a whitewash.
Five continuous days? Five continuous days of any programming would drive me away, and Da Da did. I can understand doing perhaps three or five hour blocks at a time, at night for a series of days, but to pre-empt everything for five days only serves a very narrow slice of the KBOO community. Bad plan.
I find it ironic that the Da Da festival was programmed right before KBOO tries to fundraise, in a funding crisis. Didn't the consultants mention that consistent programming was needed to keep people tuning in? It sure is a turnoff to tune in to KBOO and find Da Da, making virtually no sense, instead of the programming that I look forward to.
I have the capacity on my own to tune out from the world, and have plenty of weird music and things to listen to when I want to detach from the world. I didn't need KBOO doing the detachment for me for FIVE SOLID DAYS.
Ed