But only if you call in your opposition.
Sen. Ron Wyden 202-224-5244
The TPP is way more than a trade deal: It will gives global corporations an international tribunal of private attorneys, outside any nation's legal system, who can order compensation for any "unjust expropriation" of foreign assets.
Even better for global companies, the tribunal can order compensation for any lost profits found to result from a nation's regulations. Philip Morris is using a similar provision against Uruguay (the provision appears in a bilateral trade treaty between Uruguay and Switzerland), claiming that Uruguay's strong anti-smoking regulations unfairly diminish the company's profits.
Anyone believing the TPP is good for Americans take note: The foreign subsidiaries of U.S.-based corporations could just as easily challenge any U.S. government regulation they claim unfairly diminishes their profits -- say, a regulation protecting American consumers from unsafe products or unhealthy foods, investors from fraudulent securities or predatory lending, workers from unsafe working conditions, taxpayers from another bailout of Wall Street, or the environment from toxic emissions.
- Length: 15:01 minutes (10.31 MB)
- Format: MP3 Stereo 44kHz 96Kbps (CBR)
A small tornado that touched down Tuesday afternoon in the parking lot of a community college campus briefly lifted two people in a Jeep Cherokee into the air, then slammed the vehicle back down on its tires, witnesses said. Student Josh Hollowell was between classes at Lane Community College's main campus when he saw the twister touch down, hitting four vehicles in the parking lot. The man in the Jeep told Hollowell he and his female companion were unhurt. A short time later they drove off.
No one was hurt, college spokeswoman Joan Aschim said. "No injuries at all. We were very lucky," she said. Both Hollowell and a campus safety officer, Sgt. Lisa Rupp, estimated the Jeep was lifted about 8 feet off the ground. Hollowell, said he asked the man if he was OK. "He said he and his girl were sitting in the car when it started hailing," the witness recalled. "They got out to look at the hail, got back in, shut the door and that's when the car lifted off the ground." Eight feet off the ground.
2, Inside Climate News has revealed that a key leader of oil and gas industry front groups that oppose new fracking regulations may have been playing both sides of the issue.
In an investigation into the funding of the Environmental Defense Fund’s (EDF) work on oil and gas regulation, Inside Climate News discovered that a key EDF funder had hired FTI Consulting’s David Blackmon to promote fracking regulations. Unbeknownst to his employer, Blackmon is a longtime oil industry consultant who is paid to oppose regulation of the fracking industry.
The funder in question is the Cynthia and George Mitchell Foundation, established by the late George Mitchell, known as the “father of fracking.” George Mitchell owned and operated Mitchell Energy, the first company to combine horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing in the Barnett shale, which sparked the “shale revolution.” Mitchell created the foundation with part of the $3.5 billion sale of Mitchell Energy to Devon Energy. The Mitchell Foundation describes itself as “a grantmaking foundation that seeks innovative, sustainable solutions for human and environmental problems.”
While it’s goals seem noble, the fortunes of the Foundation and the people who run it continue to be inexorably linked to the success of the oil and gas industry.
3, “If somebody not from your country commits a crime against somebody not from your country in another country, should the courts in your country have any jurisdiction over the issue?”
With remarkable prescience, this question was posed by Shell’s own Legal Director back in 2012. Remarkable because it’s pretty much what that very same company is now attempting to try and stifle the voices of millions of people who’ve spoken out and taken action against Arctic drilling.
Shell is asking the courts in Alaska to issue a draconian injunction against Greenpeace USA to force #TheCrossing to stop by getting our activists off the rig. The company is so worried about the global media storm that erupted when Zoe, Miriam, Andreas et al scaled the Polar Pioneer rig to expose Shell’s plans to drill for oil in the Arctic this summer, it’s taken the time-honoured step of getting a legal sledge hammer to smash dissent.
4, From the Dept. of Terrible Timing: Occupancy rates are exceeding pre-recession highs, and are expected to reach record levels in 2016. Profits per room are up over 11 percent this April compared to April 2014 and the average daily rate for a room is almost 13 percent higher than it was a year ago. Executive salaries have skyrocketed.
But the little-known trade association representing this robust $163 billion dollar industry is a major force fighting behind the scenes on Capitol Hill and in statehouses and courtrooms across the country to keep workers wages low.
On Wednesday, April 15, the same day that hundreds of thousands of working people in over 200 cities are expected to participate in the largest-ever mobilization of underpaid workers, the American Hotel & Lodging Association (AHLA) which represents the 1.8 million-employee U.S. lodging industry will join forces with the National Restaurant Association to ask Congress to block a federal minimum wage increase, shrink the number of workers eligible for employer-provided health care insurance, and challenge the National Labor Relations Board ruling protecting the rights of franchise workers.
5, In Greece yesterday Anarchists attacked police with molotov cocktails and stones after a protest rally against maximum security prisons in downtown Athens, Greece, late on Tuesday.
About 400 black-clad people marched from the University of Athens administration building to the Greek parliament around 7:15 pm to demonstrate against maximum security prisons and demand the release of imprisoned terrorists. They wrote anti-establishment slogans such as “War on democracy” and “Burn all prisons” on the parliament’s courtyard wall and then returned to the university’s administration building.
6, A small tornado that touched down Tuesday afternoon in the parking lot of a community college campus briefly lifted two people in a Jeep Cherokee into the air, then slammed the vehicle back down on its tires, witnesses said. Student Josh Hollowell was between classes at Lane Community College's main campus when he saw the twister touch down, hitting four vehicles in the parking lot. The man in the Jeep told Hollowell he and his female companion were unhurt. A short time later they drove off.
No one was hurt, college spokeswoman Joan Aschim said. "No injuries at all. We were very lucky," she said. Both Hollowell and a campus safety officer, Sgt. Lisa Rupp, estimated the Jeep was lifted about 8 feet off the ground. Hollowell, said he asked the
- Length: 45:12 minutes (31.04 MB)
- Format: MP3 Stereo 44kHz 96Kbps (CBR)
Here are some of the tools you need to challenge corruption on the Columbia River...Before it is forever too late.
You can't 'restore' it, you can't 'sustain' it, if it's gone.
Here is the NW Resource Information Center:
- Length: 29:07 minutes (19.99 MB)
- Format: MP3 Stereo 44kHz 96Kbps (CBR)
487 Greenhood Road
Priest Lake, Idaho 83856-8854
April 6, 15 AM/PMt 9:37 AM
Cramer Fish Sciences Project Manager
4405 7th Ave SE, Suite 306
Lacey, WA 98503
Re: Comments on North Fork Mill Creek A to Z Project
Thank you for providing me the opportunity to comment on the North Fork Mill Creek A to Z Project (NFMC). I also want to thank you for your prompt reply to my request for the Specialist’s Reports.
I believe that the pre-decisional Environmental Assessment (EA) findings of No Significant Effects for the NFMC Proposed Action, Alternative (Alt) B and Alternative C are not supported by the documentation in the EA and the Specialist’s Reports. I will examine and comment on Alt B, but these comments are also relevant for Alt C although the the logging activities are much less than in Alt B.
I do not agree with several issues that the EA finds are “outside the project scope,” or are dealt with in other documents.
The EA does not provide any site specific information regarding the grazing impacts to the affected streams in the Project Area (PA). It states that the effect of current grazing allotments on water quality and riparian habitat are addressed in a separate grazing allotment plan. The name of the plan is not mentioned.
What is the name and date of the plan, and what grazing allotments does it cover? In a seemingly contrary move, the EA finds it necessary to discuss protections from potential adverse effects to the grazing allotment from the proposed timber sale and offers enhancements such as creating up to 200 acres of openings and proposes planting them with native grass to provide more grazing area for the existing range permit.
Have the cattle had any adverse effect on water quality and riparian habitat in the Project Area? When was the latest monitoring of site specific effects of cattle on the water resources in the PA? I could not find this information in the EA or the Specialist’s Reports.
Alt B proposes to construct an additional 30.8 miles of new temporary road in addition to the already 65 miles of Forest Service (FS) and unmapped roads in the PA. The project also proposes to increase the amount of openings by conducting shelterwood and commercial thinning logging in the PA. These actions can make easier for the cattle to access the riparian habitat and streams which can result in additional adverse impacts to the fishery in the PA. The grazing issue is significant and should be fully examined in the EA.
What stream segment in the PA has a TMDL due to excess coliform bacteria? Are the grazing allotment cattle contributing to the 303(d) status? This information should be provided in the EA.
Deforestation is linked to climate change. The EA states the impact on climate change from this logging is insignificant, but the idea of cumulative effects is to consider those things that might seen insignificant but when added to other similar actions can have a significant effect. Given the EA’s way of dealing with this issue, it could excuse all particular logging activities wherever and whenever from being considered as a contributor to climate change. The effects of deforestation on climate change should be fully considered in this EA.
A to Z EXPERIMENT
The EA avoids discussing the “elephant in the room.” In a precedent setting move, the Forest Service has granted Vaagen Brothers, a for profit timber corporation, broad and sweeping powers that includes designing the A to Z Project, doing the environmental analysis, writing the EA, deciding where, how, and how much to log, where and how many roads need to be constructed and just about everything else associated with a timber sale. The FS will make the decision.
The respective missions of the FS and the for profit Vaagen Lumber Company are different and could determine the outcome, and financial and environmental impacts of the sale. It is doubtful that the FS is going choose the No Action alternative, or significantly alter the Project since Vaagen, a member of the local community and of the Northeast Washington Forest Coalition, bid one million dollars to participate in this experiment. By having Vaggen do most of the work associated with timber sale planning and management, it provides the opportunity for the Colville National Forest (CNF) to reach its timber target. It claims it cannot currently do so because of budget and staff reductions. This is a significant action and needs to be disclosed and fully discussed in the EA.
The fact that the Proposed Action calls for a very large timber sale with an inordinately large amount of road construction could be consistent with the needs of a for-profit timber corporation. Vaagen needs to have a sale that offers a large timber volume to cover its bid price and the costs associated with the project. The public can expect large timber sales if this experiment is carried through to other timber sales. This is a national forest issue and the public throughout the country needs to know of this experiment and how it can affect the environmental outcome. The financial aspect of this experiment also needs to be fully disclosed.
The EA relies heavily on models in its effects analysis due to a paucity of on the ground scientifically credible quantitative monitoring information. There is no mention of quantitative monitoring to determine the effects of previous CNF timber sales to evaluate its effects predictions with reality.
The WEPP road model and WEPP FuME are used to estimate sediment production. The EA states that the level of confidence of these models range from 1-50% is so broad that they should only be used as a means of comparison. Yet the model’s figures are used to predict sediment levels throughout the EA. It is unreasonable to put so much weight on these models given the wide range of confidence levels. How accurate are the predictions of a increase in sediment of 63% for duration of logging activities, a decrease of 1 percent in the short term, and a 65% decrease in the long term? The CNF should realize by no that logging and road construction are not surgical strikes. Do these figures include the sediment increases during Rain on Snow (ROS) events, lack of maintenance of roads and activities on non-Forest Service managed ground in the project area?
Much is predicated on continued maintenance of new and existing roads after the project is over. Is that realistic given the reduced CNF budget and considering the poor condition of many existing roads? What percent of existing roads on CNF receive significant yearly maintenance? How many miles of CNF road received maintenance in FY 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015.
The EA, and the Hydrology and Fishery Specialist reports lacks sufficient site specific watershed analysis for each of the affected stream drainages for the public to evaluate the environmental impacts. Is there significant bedload deposition, point and mid-channel bars, and adverse effects from cattle in site specific affected stream segments? It does mention that the streams fall short of INFISH Riparian Management Objectives (RMO) for width depth ratio, sediment, stream bank angle and large woody debris. The EA does not adequately discuss the causes and the significance not meeting the RMO. How long will the affected streams will remain impaired and how will these problems effect the fishery in the short and long term?
What are the existing impacts to the fishery in the affected streams? The EA states that current sediment levels in project area streams are 23%. It does not adequately address the short and long term significance of this amount of sediment deposition. What are the site specific recorded levels of sediment for each of the affected streams? What is the significance of these levels? What is the significance of the predicted increases in sediment production in each of the affected streams and project area? How are the affected streams dealing with the accumulated sediment? How long will it take for these streams to recover and meet the RMO’s given the increase in water yield and additional sediment that will be generated by the 30.8 miles of proposed new temporary road construction, logging and cattle damage? Road construction results in sediment, decommissioning the temporary roads adds another pulse of sediment. What is involved in decommissioning roads?
RAIN ON SNOW (ROS)
Much of the logging activity takes place in areas susceptible to ROS. The timber sale proposes to build an additional 30.8 miles in addition to the existing 65 miles of road in the project area. The EA proposes 1,741 acres of shelterwood logging (avg. 75% of trees >7 inches dbh will be cut) and 2,277 acres of commercial thinning (cutting an avg. of 50% of trees). The proposed logging will change large areas from mature forest canopy to intermediate forest canopy category. The EA fails to reveal what coefficients will be used for site specific areas to evaluate the susceptibility and intensity of a ROS event. The EA does not adequately disclose the effects of ROS events on site specific drainages that have varying amounts and types of logging, road density, spacial and other characteristics that influence a ROS event. What is the existing road density and the road density post logging/road construction in the PA? How does the CNF Forest Plan deal with road density?
The EA does not compute Equivalent Clearcut Area (ECA). Proposed roads and logging create a large additional amount of openings in the Project Area which could significantly effect water quality, quantity and fish habitat. How many ECAs will be created by the proposed timber sale? What is the total amount of ECAs in the North Fork Mill Creek PA?
The Hydrology Specialist’s report, Figure 19, represents the mean daily peak flows for the North Fork Mill Creek. What date is being represented by that graph? One point in time is not an adequate means of evaluation. The use of “mean daily peak flows” is not a fair representation of flow levels. The models used to evaluate the amount of ROS flows and its impacts are no substitute for daily readings from instream gauges on the North Fork Mill Creek.
INSECTS AND DISEASE
One of the justifications for the A to Z project is to reduce susceptibility to insects and disease in the PA. Are the current levels of insects and disease beyond those found in a normally functioning forest? Are they trending beyond normal levels? Is there data from site specific surveys conducted in the PA to determine the current levels of insects and disease? What best available science was used to determine that the proposed logging will “improve” the current situation.
One Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action is to “reduce the threat of severe wildfire.” What is the basis for the assumption in the EA that the PA is ripe for a severe wildfire? The EA assumes in Alt A that without this project the chances for a severe wildfire will occur with extreme effects is increased. There are many examples of wildfires that burn in a mosaic fashion leaving a naturally functioning forest without having a significant effect on soils, water quality or wildlife. Fire is an important aspect of a naturally functioning forest.
The proposed logging will significantly open up the area and reduce the amount of existing mature forest. These logged areas will more likely be drier, warmer, susceptible to increases in wind and will generate more ground fuels than currently exist. All these characteristics have the potential to increase the risk and severity of a wildfire. The EA does not adequately discuss these increased risks. The EA also states that it will leave a lot of fine material on the ground to increase the nutrient level. What will keep the fines from burning up, especially in the areas that will be broadcast burned? The slash generated by the logging and road construction also increases the risk and intensity of wildfire.
The proposed action alternatives do not make the PA fireproof. The issue of wildfire is controversial. There are reports by credible scientists who dispute that logging significantly reduces the risk and intensity of wildfire. None of these opposing views are presented in the EA. The EA fails in its obligation to use the best available science in its analysis. The EA needs to consider the possibility of wildfire and its effects in all the action alternatives.
The EA needs to consider the cumulative effects on Mill Creek since another large timber sale, Middle and South Forks Mill Creek A to Z Project is to be implemented in the foreseeable future. These creeks and the North Fork Mill Creek drain into Mill Creek and could have significant direct, indirect and cumulative effects on Mill Creek.
The EA lacks a sufficient and credible cumulative effects analysis because it does not adequately consider the past, present and site specific future activities on non Forest Service managed land in the project area. These activities need to be more carefully considered in all the cumulative effects analysis discussed in the EA.
EA relies on unreliable models to predict the effects of the proposed project because the CNF has not had a sufficient, scientifically credible quantitative monitoring program to enhance the reliability of the EA’s predictions. Is there an implementation and effects monitoring regime proposed for this project? If so, who is responsible and what are the specific elements of the proposed monitoring?
It is hard to believe that 30.8 miles of road and 2.2 miles of road realignment plus all the ground skidding, slash piling, etc from previous activities on FS and non-FS land, combined with this proposed timber sale would not exceed soil standards considering, "Much of the surveyed area was logged and roaded, primarily 30 to 50 years ago. Substantial detrimental soil conditions (DSC) was caused by these activities.” (EA p.72) Damaged soil takes very long time to recover so existing cumulative effects of soil impacts from previous timber sales and other activities in the PA are minimized.
The leaving of large organic debris (LOD) on ground does not replicate natural conditions. Leaving LOD post logging, and cutting many of <7” trees in the logging units will not replicate the constant feed of various size trees as occurs in natural forest.
Many of the logging units appear to be located in high and moderate mass wasting areas according to the map in soil specialist’s reports (figure 5). Since there are no unit designations delineated on the map it is impossible to determine unit and road location in relation to moderate and high mass wasting hazard. EA fails to disclose the possibility and effects of mass wasting in areas with “moderate” rating.
cc: Kootenai Environmental Alliance
Selkirk Conservation Alliance
- Length: 14:41 minutes (10.09 MB)
- Format: MP3 Stereo 44kHz 96Kbps (CBR)
This, from The Columbia River InterTribal Fish Commission's website:Columbia River Treaty
The United States’ Columbia River Treaty with Canada governs hydropower and flood control on the 1,200-mile Columbia River. The current treaty, implemented in 1964, does not consider the needs of fish, a healthy river, or the treaty fishing rights and cultural resources that are now fully protected under modern laws.
The U.S. and Canada negotiated the Treaty to last at least 60 years (2024). The Treaty allows either party to terminate it but they must provide a ten-year notice of their intent to do so. That ten-year window opens in September 2014. Seeing that date on the horizon, CRITFC started taking actions during this biennium to secure seats at the table for the tribes to participate in the analyses and decisions leading up to 2014. Now 15 Columbia Basin tribes are actively working to reshape the Columbia River Treaty to protect and benefit tribal culture and resources.
The impacts of the Columbia River Treaty are second only to the decision to dam the Columbia in the 1930s. The Treaty required the construction of Duncan, Arrow, and Mica dams in Canada and allowed Libby Dam to be built in the U.S., creating more than 20 million acre-feet of new storage. Under the treaty, the U.S. paid Canada $64.4 million to provide 8.95 million acre-feet of storage for flood control in the lower Columbia, but it is only guaranteed through 2024. The U.S. returns to Canada half of the power the new Canadian storage produces in the U.S. This power, called the Canadian Entitlement, is worth on average $300 million a year.
The tribes’ participation in the Columbia River Treaty 2014/2024 Review is critical for protecting tribal rights and interests, including improving ecosystem functions and ensuring favorable conditions for other tribal resources.
In fall 2010, the Columbia Basin tribes began participating in the Treaty Review. The tribes gained the agreement of the U.S. to regard ecosystem function as coequal with flood control and power production during the Treaty Review and to include measures to restore and preserve tribal resources and culture.
The tribes are also seeking representation on the U.S. negotiating team if changes to the Columbia River Treaty are discussed with Canada. The tribes were not consulted during the initial negotiation of the Columbia River Treaty; as a result, the Treaty fails to include tribes or tribal interests.
As 2010 ended, the tribes’ small work group finished reviewing the Treaty Review Phase I and Supplemental Reports and began work on an Ecological Assessment to analyze the impacts on ecosystem functions and other tribal resources. The Phase I Report, narrowly focused on the twin obligations of power and flood control, provides baseline information about post-2024 conditions both with and without the current Columbia River Treaty. The Ecological Assessment will provide a baseline look at the Treaty’s impact on ecosystem functions.
The Columbia Basin tribes will continue holding work sessions on a recurring basis.
- Length: 30:00 minutes (20.6 MB)
- Format: MP3 Stereo 44kHz 96Kbps (CBR)
Ever heard of an ‘A to Z’ timber sale? You know…when a private logging company pays off the Forest Service for the freedom to “manage” the land.?No.
You haven’t heard of it and that is exactly what the timber industry needs – secrecy, complacency ignorance – in order to get away with the murder of a forest.
Since the Forest Service has been paid a million dollars for the
contract in which Vaagen Brothers Timber will do all the work associated with the sale,
perhaps the FS will actually make a profit. This aspect needs to be further
investigated. If that is the case, what a motivator for the agency!
We need to get ahead of the curve on this issue, if not I am pretty
sure that it will spread to other Forests and other timber sales. You know
what to do, write your legislators, the Chief of the Forest Service, letters
to the editor, op ed pieces, news releases, a letter to the Colville
National Forest, etc. It also might be a good idea to encourage your friends
in the FS to contact FSEEE and ask them to get involved. I have talked with
Andy Stahl about this sale-but he's on the fence. Let's make the public aware
that profit driven timber corporations will gain an inordinate amount of
control of their forests.
You realize that we are among the few in the country who are aware
that this is happening! It also a great poster child for what's wrong with
collaboration process-just turn the management of the timber sale program
over to profit driven timber corporations.
- Length: 45:43 minutes (31.39 MB)
- Format: MP3 Stereo 44kHz 96Kbps (CBR)
Whn will the so-called 'Timber Counties' wake up to their folly funding?
When will Oregon rein in the predators? Would be not be better
When will Cascadia finally wake up to the fact that...
A 'managed' forest is a tree farm
- Length: 14:50 minutes (10.18 MB)
- Format: MP3 Stereo 44kHz 96Kbps (CBR)
- Length: 14:47 minutes (10.15 MB)
- Format: MP3 Stereo 44kHz 96Kbps (CBR)
The rally is part of the Oregon Conservation Network's Clean Green Lobby Machine day at the Capitol, and several environmental bills will be highlighted. Linfield College chemistry professor Jim Diamond will be at the rally to show support for the legislation from a scientific perspective. "Recent studies indicate that the social costs of carbon associated with coal leads to costs on the order of 40 cents per kilowatt-hour, as opposed to the 11 or 12 cents per kilowatt-hour most people pay," says Diamond. "It's due to the health and environmental effects of coal."
71 percent of Oregon voters support the legislation, which would require Pacific Power and PGE to eliminate coal from their energy mix by 2025. Oregon's last in-state coal plant is scheduled to retire in 2020.
2, It’s time to talk Enbridge once again and the main group taking action against the energy giant, MICATS. When MICATS was born, the landscape here in Michigan was different. Enbridge was not often mentioned in the national rhetoric on tar sands, the infamous Line 6B was in the middle of being expanded, and Michigan was barely on the map in the world of tar sands activism, despite being home to the largest and costliest inland tar sands oil spill in this country’s history: the Kalamazoo River Spill. The community of southeast Michigan was suffering largely in silence from racist and calculated poisoning at the hands of Marathon Oil, the refinery that has been using Detroit as a dumping ground for decades. Silenced, ignored, and disregarded by decision-makers and regulatory bodies, this community is a classic example of environmental injustice and racism and is complicit in the perpetuation of tar sands crimes.
3, And then there’s this: Poised right in between a budding middle-class district and a neighborhood with a lower socio-economic status sits the Collingwood Garden in Toledo, Ohio. Intentionally placed in a formerly vacant lot (which had been empty for the twenty years prior), the Garden attempts to act as a bridge for the two very separate communities, and from my experience in attending a community event here at it’s near-inception, that intention seems to be playing out nicely. It was here that the metaphorical flag was hoisted on May Day in 2013. It should be added that this project began as, and still is, a guerrilla project. They now have the blessing of the city, who seems to be glad that someone is doing something with the land in a city where much of the infrastructure is collapsing, and where the people are fleeing, as is with much of Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin, and probably soon to be the newborn boom-towns with their fracking projects in North Dakota and Texas.
From the Toledo Blade
4, 4, Our main chemical safety law – the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) – is outdated and deeply flawed, allowing more than 80,000 chemicals that have never been tested for safety to be used in the United States.1
Senators Tom Udall (D-NM) and David Vitter (R-LA) have now introduced a bill to reform TSCA, but it is even worse than the existing law. Incredibly, the bill may have even been written by the American Chemistry Council, the lobbying arm of the chemical industry.2
Despite opposition from countless environmental groups and public health experts, this dangerous bill already has the support of a handful of Democrats.3 We need to stop Senate Democrats from helping Republicans do the bidding of the chemical industry.
5, Greenwashing children? Shouldn’t that be illegal? In Vancouver yesterday Rising Tide ‘scientists’ laid out the case against fracking outside Science World in Vancouver.. The event was timed to coincide with Science World’s way of celebrating World Water Day.
Rising Tides’ said “we can’t sit idly by while Science World is working alongside Christy Clark to greenwash the Liquified Fracked Gas industry. Today we are not only engaging with and educating children in the dangers of fracked gas and its impact on the climate and environment but also reaching out to the management of Science World to consider the impacts of their actions”.
Rising Tide adds, “as our popular education stalls showed today fracked gas is hugely environmentally damaging, opposed by local communities and fundamentally not an ethical or viable energy solution. The young kids passed our fracked gas quiz today, if only the same could be said for those planning the energy infrastructure of the region.”
6, Shell’s Arctic drilling fleet is on the move - even before the US government has approved the final permits.
The Greenpeace ship, Esperanza, is in the Central Pacific about 4,000 nautical miles off the West Coast of the US. They have been tracking Shell's monstrous oil rig the Polar Pioneer since it left Brunei Bay in Malaysia. Right now, Shell is heading North via Seattle to begin drilling for oil in the Arctic this summer.
The Pacific Ocean is the largest body of water on the planet. Finding one oil rig in its vastness was like finding a needle in a haystack - but Greenpeace’s ship, the Esperanza, now have them in sight.
7, Washington has accused Israel of spying on closed-door international talks with Iran about its nuclear program and relaying information from the meetings to the U.S. Congress as a way to build a case against the deal, The Wall Street Journal reported.
Citing more than a dozen current and former U.S. and Israeli officials, the WSJ said Israel eavesdropped on the negotiations and gathered information from “confidential U.S. briefings,” “informants” and “diplomatic contacts in Europe.”
- Length: 28:44 minutes (19.73 MB)
- Format: MP3 Stereo 44kHz 96Kbps (CBR)
Listen or Lose Your Soul!!!
And the whole Week's Audio plus The Reverend Billy of the Church of Stop Shopping...Live and Uncut!!!
1, Port of Longview commissioners unanimously rejected the proposed Haven Energy propane export terminal Tuesday morning, voicing concerns about the safety and the true economic impact of the $300 million project.
Commissioners Lou Johnson and Darold Dietz said they would support the project, but not at the proposed 24-acre site near Berth 4. Commissioner Bob Bagaason said it came down to a matter of trust.
It was not immediately clear whether the vote killed the project,.
2, The Oso Landslide's one year anniversary is coming up on March 22nd. And the company that undertook the investigation is GEER. The work of the GEER Association, in general, is based upon work supported in part by the National Science Foundation through the Geotechnical Engineering Program under Grant No. CMMI-0825734. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. The GEER Association is made possible by the vision and support of the NSF Geotechnical Engineering Program Directors: Dr. Richard Fragaszy and the late Dr. Cliff Astill. GEER members also donate their time, talent, and resources to collect time-sensitive field observations of the effects of extreme events.
3, The most detailed published scientific account of the mudslide, which was the deadliest in U.S. history, suggests that the disaster was years in the making in a valley with a history of huge landslides dating back thousands of years. The report doesn't offer a definitive explanation for why the mountainside collapsed on that day. But it describes a devastating chain reaction sparked by rain and groundwater on a hillside left unsettled by years of smaller slides.
The report comes from a team of university and private-sector researchers who are part of the Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance (GEER), a National Science Foundation-funded initiative to quickly dispatch scientists to evaluate natural disasters.
4, Who doesn't love Medicare? I guess we are about to find out...Aides to top House Republicans and Democrats are trying to negotiate a bipartisan compromise on the popular entitlement. And yet every year there are threats to permanently revamp the program and introduce cuts in Medicare payments to doctor. including a 21 percent reduction set to take effect April 1. Really. That april 1st.As part of the talks, bargainers are considering budget cuts that could offset part, but not all, of the measure's costs, according to lobbyists following the negotiations. The estimated 10-year price of repealing the annual Medicare cuts is roughly $175 billion.
The lobbyists said Wednesday that the package also might provide money for a children's health program that would otherwise run out of money Oct. 1.
5, North Carolina’s environmental officials have hit Duke Energy with a record $25 million fine over its role in contaminating local groundwater with pollution from a pair of coal ash pits at a disused power plant. The Duke Energy power plant site in Sutton, North Carolina has a pair of unlined dumps estimated to hold 2.6 million tons of coal ash – the waste that’s left after burning coal for electricity – which contains arsenic, mercury, lead, and over a dozen other heavy metals, many of which are toxic.
Monitoring wells near the dumps showed the pollution – which is considered a public health risk – included nine metals, among them boron, thallium, selenium, iron, manganese, and other chemicals that exceed state groundwater standards. Thallium was used for decades as the active ingredient in rat poison until it was banned due to being highly toxic.
6, Jim Lobe of LobeLog.com and has written extensively on the “neo-cons.”
He recently wrote "OMG! Cotton is Kristol’s Protege" and "GOP’s Man of the Moment Promoted by RJC’s Singer and Adelson," which states: "If Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) wasn’t the face of GOP Iran hawks, he is now. His letter making common cause with Iran’s hardliners to scuttle a nuclear deal puts Cotton, along with his 46 Republican co-signatories, in uncharted territory. ...
7, Scarlet Letter anyone? Any letter Scarlet legislators? Any red stae senator got a stamp? So, this: Iran is playing a helpful role against Islamic State militants in Iraq now, but once the extremists are vanquished, Tehran-backed militias could undermine efforts to unify the country, the top U.S. military officer said Wednesday.
Army Gen. Martin Dempsey told lawmakers that any move to counter IS is a 'positive thing." But he said there are worries about whether those Shiite militias will later turn against Sunni or Kurdish Iraqis and hamper efforts to bridge ethnic and political divisions that have made peace elusive in Iraq.
8, Sounds like a fun weekend: drones and off-roaders - plus guns of course. Yesterday The United States said that it is sending small unarmed drones, armored Humvees and other assistance to Ukraine in its fight against Russian-backed separatists. Lethal weapons were not included, to the dismay of some U.S. lawmakers. The White House said President Barack Obama is still considering whether to send weapons to Ukraine's military, weighing the risks that such aid could further inflame conflict in which more than 6,000 people have died. Risks? Risks? There are very likely an assortment of nukes still floating around the region
- Length: 61:26 minutes (42.19 MB)
- Format: MP3 Stereo 44kHz 96Kbps (CBR)